Upload files to "app_idea"
This commit is contained in:
111
app_idea/product-requirements-document.md
Normal file
111
app_idea/product-requirements-document.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
|
||||
# Product Requirements Document (PRD)
|
||||
|
||||
## App Overview
|
||||
|
||||
**Name**: TradingScriptPro
|
||||
**Description**: A web-based SaaS application that allows non-programmer retail traders to generate profitable trading strategies in PineScript for the TradingView platform without coding knowledge.
|
||||
**Tagline**: "Professional Trading Strategies Without The Code"
|
||||
|
||||
## Target Audience
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary Users**: Retail traders without programming skills who want to create custom trading strategies.
|
||||
|
||||
**User Persona**:
|
||||
- **Name**: Alex
|
||||
- **Age**: 35-45
|
||||
- **Occupation**: Part-time trader, full-time professional
|
||||
- **Technical Skills**: Understands trading concepts but has minimal programming knowledge
|
||||
- **Goals**:
|
||||
- Create profitable trading strategies for futures markets
|
||||
- Test different technical indicators without having to code
|
||||
- Share successful strategies with the trading community
|
||||
- **Pain Points**:
|
||||
- Cannot code in PineScript
|
||||
- Finds pre-made strategies too generic
|
||||
- Wants to customize strategies based on personal trading style
|
||||
- Struggles to implement complex indicator combinations
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Features
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Strategy Framework Builder**
|
||||
- Component-based strategy creation using a four-part framework:
|
||||
- Trend finder indicators
|
||||
- Entry finder indicators
|
||||
- Exit finder indicators
|
||||
- Stop loss management
|
||||
- Visual interface for selecting and configuring indicators
|
||||
- Parameter customization for each indicator
|
||||
|
||||
2. **AI-Powered Strategy Generation**
|
||||
- Integration with multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, OpenRouter.ai)
|
||||
- User-provided API keys
|
||||
- Educational content explaining generated strategies
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Strategy Management**
|
||||
- Save and organize created strategies
|
||||
- Version control for strategy iterations
|
||||
- Export to PineScript with optional detailed comments
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Social Features**
|
||||
- Share generated strategies with community
|
||||
- Export PineScript code
|
||||
|
||||
5. **User Account Management**
|
||||
- Social login via Gmail
|
||||
- Freemium model with 5 free strategy credits
|
||||
- Paid subscription for unlimited strategies and advanced features
|
||||
|
||||
## Feature Prioritization
|
||||
|
||||
| Priority | Feature | Rationale |
|
||||
|----------|---------|-----------|
|
||||
| 1 | Strategy Framework Builder | Core functionality of the application |
|
||||
| 2 | AI-Powered Strategy Generation | Primary value proposition |
|
||||
| 3 | Strategy Management | Essential for user workflow |
|
||||
| 4 | User Account Management | Required for monetization |
|
||||
| 5 | Social Features | Enhances user engagement |
|
||||
| 6 | Advanced Backtesting (Future) | Valuable but complex to implement initially |
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
1. **User Acquisition**
|
||||
- Number of registered users
|
||||
- Conversion rate from free to paid accounts
|
||||
- User retention rate
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Engagement**
|
||||
- Number of strategies created per user
|
||||
- Time spent in the application
|
||||
- Frequency of visits
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Performance**
|
||||
- Strategy generation success rate
|
||||
- API response times
|
||||
- User satisfaction rating
|
||||
|
||||
## Assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
1. Users have basic knowledge of trading concepts and technical indicators
|
||||
2. Users have access to TradingView accounts for actual trading
|
||||
3. The application will initially focus on futures markets but can expand to other instruments
|
||||
4. Users are willing to provide their own LLM API keys
|
||||
5. Generated strategies will be useful for real trading scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Technical Risks**
|
||||
- Integration complexity with multiple LLM providers
|
||||
- Ensuring generated PineScript code is valid and error-free
|
||||
- Performance issues when handling complex strategy generation
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Business Risks**
|
||||
- User resistance to providing personal API keys
|
||||
- Competition from existing strategy builders
|
||||
- Accuracy and profitability of generated strategies
|
||||
- Cost of LLM API usage affecting user adoption
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Mitigation Strategies**
|
||||
- Robust testing of PineScript output
|
||||
- Clear educational content about strategy performance expectations
|
||||
- Transparent communication about API key security measures
|
||||
- Focus on unique value proposition (no-code, AI-powered, educational)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user